News
Wikipedia's plan to roll out AI summaries wasn’t the only thing editors had gripes about, though. Wikipedia has in some ways become a byword for sober boringness, which is excellent.
Before generative AI, if you wanted an inexpensive way to build out lots of content, you launched a wiki. You’d spin up a site—broad or niche—and throw the doors open for anyone to edit.
The major underlying theme of the replies, though, was that AI summaries had the potential to seriously undermine the trust that Wikipedia had built up over its 24 years of operation. Readers are ...
Wikipedia stops AI-generated summary features after community says it can harm trust: ‘This would do immediate and irreversible…’ - The Times of India News Technology News Tech News ...
“Yuck”: Wikipedia pauses AI summaries after editor revolt JournalBot 3 minutes ago Jump to latest Follow Reply 3 minutes ago ...
The nonprofit behind Wikipedia on Wednesday revealed its new AI strategy for the next three years -- and it's not replacing the Wikipedia community of editors and volunteers with artificial ...
Not sure if someone has already pointed this out, but Wikipedia articles are supposed to begin with a good summary. If we need AI to create it, we're not doing our job.
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results