The U.S. Justice Department has determined that multiple layers of removal restrictions shielding administrative law judges ...
The Justice Department said a law protecting the officials from arbitrary removal is an unconstitutional intrusion on ...
In a Feb. 20 letter, the acting solicitor general wrote that the “multiple layers of removal protections” for administrative ...
Sarah Harris sent a letter to President Pro Tempore of the US Senate Charles Grassley on Thursday sharing the DOJ's determination that ...
The U.S. Justice Department has decided that the protection layers for administrative law judges are unconstitutional, ending ...
Judge Cooper said that he was denying the unions’ request that he block the Trump administration from continuing its ...
Trump’s DOJ said the president can fire administrative law judges at will, challenging legal protections amid broader efforts to expand executive power.
The U.S. Justice Department has declared that removal restrictions protecting administrative law judges are unconstitutional.
The Trump administration argues that President Trump has the constitutional power to fire administrative law judges without cause, challenging existing protections against political interference.
Administrative law judges claim that the potential disclosure of their personal information sought by the Department of Government Efficiency threatens their safety, in a lawsuit that joins a wave of ...
DOJ determined that “multiple layers” of removal restrictions “shielding administrative law judges (ALJs) are unconstitutional,” Chief of Staff Chad Mizelle says in statement.
Rock Spring customers have faced outages and poor service for years. A judge just ordered one of Pennsylvania’s largest ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results